On Jun 5, 2023, at 12:45 PM, Tim Wicinski <[email protected]> wrote: > The Chairs and Eric are working on the asumption that the document will be > parked waiting for another implementation or two and some interopt testing > > However, we are usinfg this time for Early area reviews which will feel will > bei invaluable moving forward. > We focused on the Security area, Int Area, and those pesky DNS folks to > review the documennt > > I believe at IETF 117 there was some discussion of some interopt testing > during the hackathon? > I may have made that up also. > > The authors have been working diligently updating their work, and Paul is > just letting the WG know they've done their part.
Er, no, we really do believe that all the interop testing done at IETF 116, which is reported in the draft, is sufficient. It is certainly more than the amount that many other protocols get before they are published as RFCs. How much more interop testing is needed before the document can proceed? There will be parties like Verisign that will never want this to be on standards track, which is fine, but that has never been an acceptable reason to block progress when there are others who have already implemented it. --Paul Hoffman _______________________________________________ dns-privacy mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dns-privacy
