On 9/11/2014 5:22 PM, Colm MacCárthaigh wrote: > On Thu, Sep 11, 2014 at 5:03 PM, Mark Andrews <ma...@isc.org> wrote: >> Which indicates broken recursive servers. Recursive servers should >> be expecting misconfigured authoritative servers. You don't stuff >> up authoritative behaviour because you have broken recursive servers. > I do whatever is best for customers: partially delayed resolution, > which is then mitigated by caching, is better than partial outages.
i don't agree i think it's better for your customers if they see an outage. because that outcome has some hope of forcing the broken authority servers to feel some heat. if you act as an "enabler" for bad authority server behaviour, then that behaviour can become entrenched. giving away your first-mover advantage will hurt your customers, a lot, in the long run. and my customers, too. vixie _______________________________________________ dns-operations mailing list dns-operations@lists.dns-oarc.net https://lists.dns-oarc.net/mailman/listinfo/dns-operations dns-jobs mailing list https://lists.dns-oarc.net/mailman/listinfo/dns-jobs
