>> >> It was curious to see that a to-be-unnamed TLD registry, a newcomer to >> the scene many years after the holy wars that ended up defining the >> current RFCs, writing completely new code, mentioned that they found >> attributes to be a better option, but decided to go with host objects >> due to registrar support. This doesn't prove which way is better, but >> for me it indicates that the role in the value chain can play a part in >> which option is preferred. > > Nominet is another example along those lines: alongside the .uk namespace > change they have switched to a more standard EPP implementation. > > http://registrars.nominet.org.uk/namespace/uk/registration-and-domain-management/registrar-systems/epp > http://registrars.nominet.org.uk/content/what-are-differences-between-nominet-epp-and-standard-epp
Commonplace is different from standard. Both are standards, and I disagree with their naming of it. Rubens _______________________________________________ dns-operations mailing list dns-operations@lists.dns-oarc.net https://lists.dns-oarc.net/mailman/listinfo/dns-operations dns-jobs mailing list https://lists.dns-oarc.net/mailman/listinfo/dns-jobs
