Edward Lewis wrote: > Why an /IETF/ document? In what way does Response Rate Limiting > impact interoperability of implementations? > > If this is not an independent submission, how does it fit into a > working group? The implementations are pretty much out there, what's > to work on? > > I understand that would be useful is a reference-able document > describing the RRL. That is, something stable and reviewed - and that > could be an RFC. But an RFC does not have to come through the IETF.
gentlemen, this is gangster on gangster violence. please figure out which i to dot and which t to cross, and let me know. i promise on my honour to do my best to appease the internet standards gods in their current invocation.
_______________________________________________ dns-operations mailing list dns-operations@lists.dns-oarc.net https://lists.dns-oarc.net/mailman/listinfo/dns-operations dns-jobs mailing list https://lists.dns-oarc.net/mailman/listinfo/dns-jobs
