Paul Hoffman wrote: > ... > > I think it should be Experimental, it should discuss any differences that the > BIND and NSD folks have, and it should be an individual submission. > > After than, people can discuss the different approaches over maybe a year, > and if there is kinda general agreement, it can come to DNSOP for BCP > consideration. If it fails there, the Experimental RFC still lives on. > > Old-style IETF (RFC that really requests comments), and only later settling > on what to tell the community as "best".
suits me.
_______________________________________________ dns-operations mailing list dns-operations@lists.dns-oarc.net https://lists.dns-oarc.net/mailman/listinfo/dns-operations dns-jobs mailing list https://lists.dns-oarc.net/mailman/listinfo/dns-jobs
