Why an IETF document? In what way does Response Rate Limiting impact interoperability of implementations?
If this is not an independent submission, how does it fit into a working group? The implementations are pretty much out there, what's to work on? I understand that would be useful is a reference-able document describing the RRL. That is, something stable and reviewed - and that could be an RFC. But an RFC does not have to come through the IETF. On Feb 4, 2013, at 14:39, Andrew Sullivan wrote: > On Mon, Feb 04, 2013 at 10:54:36AM -0800, Paul Hoffman wrote: >> We now have two implementation of response rate limiting (RRL). In order for >> it to be widely adopted, an Internet-Draft followed by an RFC would be >> Really Helpful. > What track do you expect this to go along? Is this a DNSOP draft? -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- Edward Lewis NeuStar You can leave a voice message at +1-571-434-5468 There are no answers - just tradeoffs, decisions, and responses.
_______________________________________________ dns-operations mailing list dns-operations@lists.dns-oarc.net https://lists.dns-oarc.net/mailman/listinfo/dns-operations dns-jobs mailing list https://lists.dns-oarc.net/mailman/listinfo/dns-jobs
