On Sun, 8 Jul 2018 at 14:24:32 -0700 Jimmy Johnson <field.engin...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On 07/08/2018 02:25 AM, Antony Stone wrote: > > On Saturday 07 July 2018 at 14:03:33, Alessandro Selli wrote: > > > >> On Fri, 6 Jul 2018 at 10:52:20 -0700 Jimmy Johnson wrote: > >> > >>> Good sources > > > > Who / where? > > > You have to do a lot of reading, the information is out there Where? Please provide with some reference. > going back > to 2012 the main source is wanted by usa The Linux kernel sources have always been free for everybody to download and use the way they seem fit. > and has been given a gag order > by his keepers or will be forced to leave his protected living quarters. Sounds like a childish conspiracy theory to me. >>>> tell me we need our own kernel, >>> >>> Why? What's wrong with the available ones? [...] > 'IF' our existing kernel has a > backdoor client in it there is nothing 'I' can do about it, Yes, you can: you can remove it, you can patch the kernel. > but sources say I need to roll my own kernel. Starting from what? A from-scratch rewrite of the kernel? Alessandro _______________________________________________ Dng mailing list Dng@lists.dyne.org https://mailinglists.dyne.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/dng
