On Tue, Jun 20, 2017 at 07:47:08PM +0200, Joachim Fahrner wrote: > Am 2017-06-20 18:58, schrieb KatolaZ: > >What could be relevant is that, as several people have already pointed > >out, GNOME 3 is still available for platforms in which systemd is not > >present (e.g., FreeBSD: https://www.freebsd.org/gnome/). The main > >problem in having "that" GNOME 3 in Devuan is the availability of a > >sufficient number (which I cannot quantify, but would probably be >1) > >of maintainers who are willing to delve into the FreeBSD port, and > >transform that huge thing into a viable set of deb packages which play > >well with the stuff currently present in Devuan (ascii? > >beowulf?). This is totally doable, if people really want GNOME 3 in > >Devuan. > > I disagree. This should be a task for gnome developers, if they want to be > compatible with non-systemd systems (FreeBSD, Devuan...). If they don't, > then forget Gnome. ANY developer outside of the gnome team will ALWAYS be > behind the actual development, resulting in unstable ports. I would not > accept such ugly "third party workarounds".
We have enough work being an "ugly" "third party workaround" for Debian. -- hendrik _______________________________________________ Dng mailing list Dng@lists.dyne.org https://mailinglists.dyne.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/dng
