On 07/30/2016 04:18 AM, Rick Moen wrote:
Quoting Steve Litt (sl...@troubleshooters.com):
In all fairness to Rick, he was making his statements on SVLUG, and
then, on DNG, *I* referenced the SVLUG archive of the SVLUG discussion,
and only then did he repeat his assertions here.
And my assertions stated that I like Devuan and appreciate it. All I
said that threw you into a tizzy was that I estimated that its
objectives could also have been achieved through lesser means.
Which is why it could be construed that you disagree with a fork of
Debian - a for of Debian as in "A fork of Debian that could be said to
have been started because the default init system in Debian became
systemd." - that fork of Debian - not a theoretical fork.
People who insist on treating me like an enemy are being rather stupid.
Those who persist in attributing to me statements I've never made and
views I don't hold are being _very_ stupid.
Of course I should be more sensitive, but hopefully I didn't make you
feel like an enemy. I am merely trying to help explain why you might
appear to some people that way, but now there is no point in me chewing
on my foot any longer, is there?
_______________________________________________
Dng mailing list
Dng@lists.dyne.org
https://mailinglists.dyne.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/dng
