On Fri, 18 Dec 2015 17:06:43 +0100
John Hughes <j...@atlantech.com> wrote:
> > I previously thought that Devuan aim was to remove
> > *any* of systemd components.
>
> Funny, I thought Devuan was about choice.
Yes and no. This was discussed several months ago.
A huge priority of Devuan is to allow choice. However, because each
systemd-ism tends to restrict choice, Devuan has decided to simply
throw away the systemd-ism if a) It requires work to fit in, or b) it
hinders any kinds of other choices users might make.
Also there's this: Read the front page of devuan.org and read this:
"We are working towards a stable, production ready fork of Debian
Jessie, free from the entangling web of dependencies imposed by
systemd."
It's clear that, although choice is a huge priority, systemd is and has
always been and will always be a special case.
SteveT
Steve Litt
November 2015 featured book: Troubleshooting Techniques
of the Successful Technologist
http://www.troubleshooters.com/techniques
_______________________________________________
Dng mailing list
Dng@lists.dyne.org
https://mailinglists.dyne.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/dng
