On Fri, 18 Dec 2015 18:51:02 +0300 Mitt Green <mitt_gr...@yahoo.com> wrote:
> >is nothing but "systemd support code added to some > >package". > > If it is so, why there is so much hype about it? > I previously thought that Devuan aim was to remove > *any* of systemd components. I think this is settled law, settled on our mailing list many months ago. Here's how I remember the consensus during that discussion... Yeah, in an ideal world, we'd like to remove every rotting vestige of systemd, but in a practical world, where if we don't timely produce something people can actually use, this has all been for naught, removal is a process, where on the first go-around we remove systemd as PID1 and the process supervisor, put it out there, and then, with the influx of devs and testers that are sure to follow, continue removing systemd-isms as fast as we can, hopefully someday getting to the point where we can remove them just weeks after the obfuscationists put them in. Does that sound like the goal the rest of you remember? Thanks, SteveT Steve Litt November 2015 featured book: Troubleshooting Techniques of the Successful Technologist http://www.troubleshooters.com/techniques _______________________________________________ Dng mailing list Dng@lists.dyne.org https://mailinglists.dyne.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/dng