On Sun, 22 Feb 2015, Didier Kryn wrote: > I must confess I discovered ZeroMQ recently; it looks like the > thing the programmer always needed since the advent of networking. > I was blaming myself for not having used it in a > multi-host+multi-language project started 7 years ago, but, well, > it didn't exist yet :-).
let me warn you, having used zmq extensively for various jobs, that unfortunately it does not deliver everything it says. At least for me it was so until a couple years ago, for instance with its pub/sub protocol and more. In my +15yr programmers experience it has never been a smooth ride and I ended up saving time reimplementing my own procedures on top of basic UDP and TCP functions - or reverting to older versions which worked more reliably before adoption of zmq, this was the case with syncstarter.org for instance. its a pity because it looks very good and aims at good directions, I hope it keeps improving. so well, your mileage may vary, but my experience and that of a couple good programmers we have at dyne.org has been always quite negative. And even if it would work, I don't think zmq would be a good solution to adopt as networking library for an ORB broker. ciao _______________________________________________ Dng mailing list Dng@lists.dyne.org https://mailinglists.dyne.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/dng
