Le 15/02/2015 19:36, Nate Bargmann a écrit :
* On 2015 15 Feb 07:33 -0600, Vince Mulhollon wrote:
Meanwhile the devs can't eat their own dogfood because they're not utter
noobs, and nobody wants the featurelist marketing is pushing.
Indeed.  I've followed Planet Debian for some time and do read LWN semi
regularly.  It astonished me at first to read of $RANDOM_DEVELOPER using
a Apple laptop at a Linux development conference.  Okay, fine, if
they're dual-booting and actually running a Linux based desktop, but,
sadly, they often are not and are instead running whatever Linux thing
they're demonstrating in a VM.  This is a large crux of the problem as I
see it--developers unwilling to use what they write not only at work but
on their own time.

Down the road I would hope that when the Devuan project has developer
conferences that someone showing up with a proprietary OS running Devuan
in a VM would be kindly shown the door!  ;-)

Why FOSS projects feel the need to emulate this toxic corporate culture is
a complete mystery, but they certainly do a good job of it.
I really give credence to the line of thought that a lot of these
developers have been poured in by the very corporate structures they're
bringing to our systems.  They have been given projects as part of their
employment and probably do not understand nor care for the community as
it existed up to four or five years ago (c.f. comments that the
community is "harsh" or "difficult to work with).  To me this is the
result of a major culture clash and this "modern" Linux is the result.

Prior to that point in time development was largely grassroots and
organic.  We were told that such was a "problem" for Linux to go
"mainstream".  Today we have this mess that looks to be expanding (do
the Debian developers even know what's in store once the Sid repository
opens up after the release of Jessie?)  nearly exponentially and the
mantra is that everything that is "old" (read, mostly debugged and
stable) must be swept aside for "mainstream acceptance".

Now I need to go and get the valentine ISO and play in a VM (on my
Debian desktop, of course)!  :-)

- Nate

This move happened in the last decade. I understand it as computing departments understanding that it was more expensive to pay people to install and maintain Linux on PCs and laptops than buy Macs for their employees.

And the employees are proud because their Mac is shiny and EXPENSIVE. They would feel ashamed to have something cheaper.

And even the developpers, who are perfectly able to install Linux, would feel ashamed to not have a Mac, maybe only because knote is more shiny than libre-office. And running Linux in a VM is more productive than dual-boot because you can vave both in the same time.

    Didier

_______________________________________________
Dng mailing list
Dng@lists.dyne.org
https://mailinglists.dyne.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/dng

Reply via email to