On Sat, Feb 14, 2015 at 05:46:03PM +0000, Luke Leighton wrote: [very long cut]
> > this is again a self-fulfilling statement of intent, where i have > demonstrated logically and rationally above that the grounds for the > conclusion that you draw are incorrect. > > is there anything that you can perceive which is incorrect about the > rationale i give above? Hi Luke, a very nice theory is yours, indeed, and I am not kidding. Unfortunately, in practice we already might miss some of the packages of Jessie because of the systemd-nonsense, and not because of an explicit anti-Debian choice of Devuan developers. And things will apparently not get better anytime soon, since more and more packages are including dependencies on the systemd-nonsense, and this is totally beyond your control. For the moment I would be content to have a working Devuan (i.e., a Debian without the systemd-nonsense), knowing that it inherits some of the merits of one of the most important collaborative projects in the history of Free Software, wouldn't you? :) HND KatolaZ -- [ Enzo Nicosia aka KatolaZ --- GLUG Catania -- Freaknet Medialab ] [ me [at] katolaz.homeunix.net -- http://katolaz.homeunix.net -- ] [ GNU/Linux User:#325780/ICQ UIN: #258332181/GPG key ID 0B5F062F ] [ Fingerprint: 8E59 D6AA 445E FDB4 A153 3D5A 5F20 B3AE 0B5F 062F ] _______________________________________________ Dng mailing list Dng@lists.dyne.org https://mailinglists.dyne.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/dng
