On Thu, 12 Feb 2015 12:46:42 -0300 Renaud (Ron) OLGIATI <ren...@olgiati-in-paraguay.org> wrote:
> On Thu, 12 Feb 2015 15:40:33 +0000 > KatolaZ <kato...@freaknet.org> wrote: > > > Having said that, and besides the fact > > that I don't understand what you mean by a "temporary fork" (a fork > > is a fork, it happens at a point in time and unless you can travel > > back in the past, a fork has to be *permanent* by definition), > > nobody can decide now whether in the long run Devuan will drift > > apart from Debian only a bit or substantually. > > Fork is permanent only as long as the two branches do not later > converge and rejoin. > > Who knows, maybe the Debian devs will realize they are missing > something, and integrate the non-systemd in a later release... But even so, we must continue as a separate community, because without the existance of Devuan, Debian might later lapse into its "we listen to Redhat more than our users" mode. SteveT Steve Litt * http://www.troubleshooters.com/ Troubleshooting Training * Human Performance _______________________________________________ Dng mailing list Dng@lists.dyne.org https://mailinglists.dyne.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/dng
