On Wed 08/Jan/2025 23:58:27 +0100 Daniel K. wrote:

    +==============+==========+=============================+
    | Element name | Required | Content                     |
    +==============+==========+=============================+

    +==============+=======+=============================+
    | Element name | Req'd | Content                     |
    +==============+=======+=============================+

The name is more explicit and wider. The cost is one or two pages extra
compared to the "#" alternative above.

For these two, the value of the 'Required' column may be:

No:  OPTIONAL
Yes: REQUIRED
No *: 0 or more elements
Yes *: 1 or more elements

How about this?

     +==============+==========+========+=============================+
     | Element name | Required | Unique | Content                     |
     +==============+==========+========+=============================+


Best
Ale
--






_______________________________________________
dmarc mailing list -- [email protected]
To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]

Reply via email to