It appears that Daniel K. <[email protected]> said: >On 12/30/24 16:25, Mark E. Mallett wrote: >> On Sun, Dec 29, 2024 at 12:13:59AM +0000, Daniel K. wrote: >>> The tables also lose information on where the order of elements is >>> mandated by the XSD. There's no room for more columns to describe it. >> >> If extra effort (like side notes) are needed to accomodate a table, that >> makes the table less attractive (to me). OTOH maybe the "required" column >> could be turned into "notes" or some such thing, with there being notes >> to indicate "required" or "optional" or "ordered." > >There are many problems with tables. > >* The markdown syntax mandates that one row is on a single line, that >makes it a bit cumbersome to edit if you have a lot of content. > >* Lack of control over formatting, especially column widths. > >* Lack of horizontal space.
Keep in mind that the editors at the RPC do the final edits and formatting tweaks. So long as it is clear what your table is supposed to show, don't worry about making it look beautiful. This stuff is complicated no matter how we present it so I think a table is as good an option as any. R's, John _______________________________________________ dmarc mailing list -- [email protected] To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]
