On 1/9/25 18:44, Alessandro Vesely wrote: > How about this? > > +==============+==========+========+=============================+ > | Element name | Required | Unique | Content | > +==============+==========+========+=============================+
Unexpectedly, this did not cause any extra pages to be required for the output: https://ietf.vendo.no/draft-ietf-dmarc-aggregate-reporting-table-four-col.txt Given that only 4 of the 13 tables have one element each that can repeat, I think it's overkill to add this as a separate column. For consistency, I discarded the option of omitting the column from the tables that only have "Yes" as the value for all elements. Daniel K. _______________________________________________ dmarc mailing list -- [email protected] To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]
