Dotzero writes: > If a person isn't participating/implementing DMARC (yet), how are > they supposed to determine whether they want to implement it if they > accept your demand that they not read the specification? This seems > a bit extreme to demand that people not read a public document.
We do not write RFCs using such text normally. RFCs tell what the implementations need to do to implement the thing. If they are not interested implementing they ignore the RFC (regardless whether they read it or not). If we need to add "If you plan to implement this RFC, then you need to do xxx" for every single action in the RFC, it gets impossible to read it. We simply say "Do xxx" without extra junk. -- [email protected] _______________________________________________ dmarc mailing list -- [email protected] To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]
