On Thu, Dec 5, 2024 at 3:02 PM Tero Kivinen <[email protected]> wrote:
> Richard Clayton writes: > > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- > > >It says: > > > > > > ... A Mail Receiver MUST implement > > > support for a "mailto:"; URI, i.e., the ability to send a DMARC > > > report via electronic mail. > > > > > >both for rua and ruf tags, so I think that is supposed to mean that > > >mailto urls are mandatory to implement for sending reports. > > > > so it does ... that's clearly not nuanced enough. It needs to say > > something like a "Mail Receiver participating in DMARC MUST ..." > > > > can the editors please fix that. > > Why? This document is documenting DMARC, everybody who implement this > is participating in DMARC, so we do not need to add those extra words. > > If you are not participating in DMARC, do not implement or read this > specification. If you do want to implement DMARC, you do all the MUSTs > listed in this specification and there is no need to say that "if you > implement this RFC, you MUST do x". > <SNIP> If a person isn't participating/implementing DMARC (yet), how are they supposed to determine whether they want to implement it if they accept your demand that they not read the specification? This seems a bit extreme to demand that people not read a public document. Michael Hammer.
_______________________________________________ dmarc mailing list -- [email protected] To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]
