On Thu 31/Dec/2020 16:37:38 +0100 John R Levine wrote:
On Thu, 31 Dec 2020, Alessandro Vesely wrote:
On Wed 30/Dec/2020 22:23:20 +0100 John R Levine wrote:
[ add ruap= to allow https in preference to mailto ]
I still like better sticking to a unique tag (rua=) and applying OR-slashes.
With a comma, it is backward compatible:
v=DMARC1; p=none; rua=mailto:[email protected], mailto:[email protected],
/https://service.example/report/;
No, it's invalid according to the syntax in RFC 7489.
I see. We have:
dmarc-auri = "rua" *WSP "=" *WSP
dmarc-uri *(*WSP "," *WSP dmarc-uri)
URI = scheme ":" hier-part [ "?" query ] [ "#" fragment ]
scheme = ALPHA *( ALPHA / DIGIT / "+" / "-" / "." )
So /https cannot be a scheme. How about:
v=DMARC1; p=none; rua=mailto:[email protected],
mailto:[email protected], OR-https://service.example/report/;
We have no idea what existing implementations do with DMARC records with syntax
errors.
Here's an experiment -- put that slash syntax in the rua= in your DMARC record
and see who does or doesn't continue sending reports.
Done, with the second alternative.
Best
Ale
--
_______________________________________________
dmarc mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmarc
