On Wed, 20 Jan 2021, Alessandro Vesely wrote:
John's record looks more workable, but it's still fluffy:
"v=DMARC1; p=none; rf=afrf;
rua=mailto:[email protected],https://dmreport.abuse.net/dmreport/;
ruf=mailto:[email protected]";
Whaddaya mean fluffy? Try a PUT or POST to that URI and it'll work.
I suppose the good news is that nobody implemented the underspecified
report URL in one of the earlier DMARC drafts.
It is not underspecified. It specifies the /mailto:/ scheme. ...
Early drafts had an http PUT with some error that would have prevented it
from working. It was removed before 7489 was published.
Regards,
John Levine, [email protected], Taughannock Networks, Trumansburg NY
Please consider the environment before reading this e-mail. https://jl.ly
_______________________________________________
dmarc mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmarc
