In article <[email protected]> you write: >>> I didn't get any of those (the POSTs below are not to the right URI) >>> but it's impressive how fast Russian bots started to probe it, within >>> hours. >> >> I thought it's about interoperability. Simply having a webserver running >> doesn't come close to interoperability, and certainly not at scale. > >I guess I wasn't clear enough. I know there's no http reporting in DMARC, >but there was in an early version of the spec. I was wondering if anyone >had implemented that. Apparently not.
I must admit one thing that did surprise me was that something is looking at DMARC DNS records and probing the https URIs they contain, since that is the only place there are referecnes to my newly created https reporting URI. R'sm John _______________________________________________ dmarc mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmarc
