In article <[email protected]> you write: >>> Got it. However, the spec says it's a list of addresses to which aggregate >>> feedback is to be sent. When there are multiple entries, up to now, >>> reports >>> are sent to each. ...
>The VALCHAR element in Section 3.2 of RFC 6376 accepts "/", which is seldom >used in email addresses and >ubiquitous in https URIs. We could convene that when a mailto is to be >considered as an alternative ... If we want to do something like that, I would overload the existing !size hack. For example, add an "f" for finished flag and say that the URIs are conceptually processed from left to right and if you send your report to one with a !f (or !10mf or the like) flag, you can stop. Still not convinced this is useful but it is slightly more backward compatible. _______________________________________________ dmarc mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmarc
