On Thu 03/Dec/2020 00:34:32 +0100 John Levine wrote:
In article <[email protected]> you write:
A better means to control report size is to gauge the reporting interval.
When this came up before someone said that reports can be extremely
large, many megabytes. An HTTP POST or PUT is a much better way to send that.
However faster, an https PUT/POST at midnight arrives later than a mailto at
midday.
Here's another nit: POST doesn't pass the report's filename. There
should be a copy of the name in the header of the gzip data, but
semantically it would be better to do an https PUT to
<url>/<filename>. That also has the advantage of being idempotent so
if it puts the same file twice the server can tell it's a duplicate.
Yes, PUT is better than POST.
How about pgp-signing the file with the dkim key?
Best
Ale
--
_______________________________________________
dmarc mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dmarc
