On Thu, Mar 19, 2009 at 2:53 AM, Torsten Bronger <bron...@physik.rwth-aachen.de> wrote: > Okay, C. Well, most of the library and framework stuff is missing > but I assume that this could be done, given that the financial > benefit is there. But actually I still don't get your analogy.
You asked, basically, "since Java is faster than Python, why would anybody use Python instead of Java?" I turned this around into "since C is faster than Java, why would you use Java instead of C?" In other words, if raw execution speed of the application code is the decisive factor for you, why are you choosing to use anything other than the "fastest" available language? Since you're not using the "fastest" available language, this means you recognize that there are often other factors which are just as important, and which can sway the final decision. Which means you already know the answer to your question: raw execution speed isn't everything. Also, there are web frameworks in C. They just aren't that popular, for some reason... -- "Bureaucrat Conrad, you are technically correct -- the best kind of correct." --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Django users" group. To post to this group, send email to django-users@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to django-users+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/django-users?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
