Thanks for the information! Low level worked for me :-)
Keep up the good work! >>MM On Nov 20, 12:48 am, Malcolm Tredinnick <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Mon, 2007-11-19 at 08:50 -0800, MichaelMartinides wrote: > > Hi James, > > > I entirely understand your point. > > > But for users as me, it makes a difference to know if a feature is in > > very far distant or rather near future... > > > I tried the branch it worked in command mode line as expected but gave > > an error when I tried it in the browser, so I simply asked. > > It's completely unready for testing. This is noted on the wiki page for > the branch:http://code.djangoproject.com/wiki/QuerysetRefactorBranch > > Due to the very low-level technical nature of the changes, correctness > at the SQL level is the first aim and *then* adjusting the rest of the > code. So I wouldn't be testing it yet. > > As Karen said, end of the month is the rough target. It certainly won't > be earlier than that, might be a bit later. Depends on how much Real > Life I have between now and then. > > Malcolm > > -- > Success always occurs in private and failure in full > view.http://www.pointy-stick.com/blog/ --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Django users" group. To post to this group, send email to django-users@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/django-users?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
