On Thu, Apr 12, 2012 at 10:01 AM, David <cthl...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Log.objects.distinct('thing__id').order_by('thing__id',
> '-modified_on').select_related().filter(thing__deleted=0)[:20]
>
> By avoiding the use of values() I was able to then use the result as an
> object and access everything I needed.
>
> The above ORM statement however does not look as elegant to read as I have
> come to expect from Django though. The resulting SQL doesn't seem too
> shabby however.
>
Django has a tendency of making you write really long lines, but I guess
you could break it into smaller chunks to improve readability.
logs = Log.objects.distinct('thing__id').order_by('thing__id',
'-modified_on')
related = logs.select_related().filter(thing__deleted=0)[:20]
Cheers,
AT
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Django users" group.
To post to this group, send email to django-users@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
django-users+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/django-users?hl=en.
