On Apr 12, 4:01 pm, David <cthl...@gmail.com> wrote:
> The above ORM statement however does not look as elegant to read as I have
> come to expect from Django though. The resulting SQL doesn't seem too
> shabby however.
.distinct(fields) + .order_by() is pretty low level stuff - that is
why it would be nice if there was a dedicated API for queries like
this. Something like:
> qs.first_related('log', order_by='-modified_on')
OUT: qs annotated with log entries.
Turning that into efficient and cross-DB compliant SQL isn't the
easiest thing to do. If you want N first objects instead of one, then
it is going to be even harder.
- Anssi
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Django users" group.
To post to this group, send email to django-users@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
django-users+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/django-users?hl=en.
