On Fri, Jul 8, 2011 at 3:04 PM, Cal Leeming [Simplicity Media Ltd] <cal.leem...@simplicitymedialtd.co.uk> wrote: > Although I'm sure both methods would work, would you recommend any > particular preference? (as my preference is merely on the fact that > having a wrapper seems a lot cleaner). > > I guess the custom binary I was trying to think of earlier used the > setrlimit/fork method mentioned above.
There is only one way to modify limits, and that is setrlimit, which is how ulimit is implemented. Given ulimit and setrlimit are both in POSIX, I don't see why anyone would write their own wrapper to do this. The way I typically add limits is to edit the rc (startup) script, and add a call to ulimit there. This applies the limit to the process which launches the daemon, its a simple clean one liner, and doesn't require massaging command line arguments into a sh -c '' line (or bash). Cheers Tom -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Django users" group. To post to this group, send email to django-users@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to django-users+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/django-users?hl=en.
