Thank you for taking the time to reply though! On Fri, Jul 8, 2011 at 2:33 PM, Tom Evans <tevans...@googlemail.com> wrote: > On Fri, Jul 8, 2011 at 2:23 PM, Cal Leeming [Simplicity Media Ltd] > <cal.leem...@simplicitymedialtd.co.uk> wrote: >> Hi Roberto, >> >> Wonder if you might be able to give me some advice.. >> >> Is there is a way to limit the address space of any other binary, >> without relying on /etc/security/limits.conf?? >> >> For example, is it possible to do something like this: >> >> ./magic-here --limit-as=256M -- /usr/sbin/some-legacy-binary-here >> >> ^^ that would then wrap the binary, enforcing a maximum address space of >> 256M. >> >> As you gave the option --limit-as to uwsgi, which can apply to any >> python webapp, I was wondering if it's possible for us to do the same, >> but without compiling the original binary into uwsgi. >> >> Let me know if the above doesn't make any sense lol. >> >> Cal >> > > ulimit -a > > Eg: ulimit -s 4096 > > Cheers > > Tom > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "Django users" group. > To post to this group, send email to django-users@googlegroups.com. > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > django-users+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. > For more options, visit this group at > http://groups.google.com/group/django-users?hl=en. > >
-- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Django users" group. To post to this group, send email to django-users@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to django-users+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/django-users?hl=en.
