On Sun, Jun 20, 2010 at 11:51 PM, Richard Shebora <sheb...@gmail.com> wrote: > Russ, > Thanks for this clarification. After reading your post I went > to http://pinaxproject.com/ and do indeed see your point. I am happy to > jump on board and help with the project that is the generally accepted place > for learning about (i stress learning about for me), and improving django > application portability across django projects. > Is it a consensus that Pinax is this project, even if by default because > it's the best and biggest so far? I hope so because it has a major head > start and doing any of this work from scratch would be much harder. > <prayer>Please let every say Pinax is the one!</prayer> If it is not, how > do we agree on the best project to expend time and effort? > Responses? Clarifications? Votes?
Pinax is as good an example of large-scale best practice as I'm aware of. The only other examples I would point at are the reusable apps published by James Bennett (ubernostrum); he's given numerous talks on the subject of reusability at various PyCons and DjangoCons; his talks, blog and book are also useful resources. Yours, Russ Magee %-) -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Django users" group. To post to this group, send email to django-us...@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to django-users+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/django-users?hl=en.
