On 15/05/13 19:36, ptone wrote: > I wonder if a slightly more concise version of this should be added to > the triaging docs instead of a wiki page (fine place to draft it though). > > https://docs.djangoproject.com/en/dev/internals/contributing/triaging-tickets/#closing-tickets > > I feel that the wiki pages aren't very discoverable, and unless we are > talking about patching trac to include this, such a comment won't carry > the official weight of being in the project docs.
That's a good idea. The purpose of this wiki page is to make it easy for triagers to link to - I personally hate having to go and find the right page in the docs, but I can remember to do "DevelopersMailingList" instead of "developers mailing list". > One line I do feel needs a tweak: > > "while the suggestion is good in theory, it lacks enough merit to exceed > the cost it will add to the maintenance of Django" > > The truth is, there are some suggestions that are just flat out > incompatible. I'm fine to be gracious and thankful for the time someone > takes to offer a suggestion, but that doesn't mean that all suggestions > are automatically meritorious. I guess we would normally use INVALID for something that was just a bad idea, whereas WONTFIX recognises there is a valid issue, but we're not going to do anything about it. I've already removed reference to INVALID on that page, but I'll tweak the text - feel free to make more changes. Luke -- "If something is hard, it's not worth doing." (Homer Simpson) Luke Plant || http://lukeplant.me.uk/ -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Django developers" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/django-developers?hl=en. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
