On Mon, 30 Aug 2021 at 19:36, sebb <seb...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> On Mon, 30 Aug 2021 at 13:25, Rich Bowen <rbo...@rcbowen.com> wrote:
> >
> >
> >
> > On 8/30/21 6:07 AM, sebb wrote:
> > > The CLC checker flags lots of words, but does not give any help to
> > > projects in how to replace them.
> > >
> > > Whilst different contexts may require different solutions, it would
> > > help to at least point to some pages where previously worked out
> > > solutions are described.
> > >
> > > Otherwise projects are likely to waste a lot of time trying to find a
> > > suitable repalcement or just not bother.
> > >
> > > All stick and no carrot.
> >
> > There is no stick at all - no mandate or compulsion of any kind. The
> > carrot is the opportunity to make our communities more welcoming.
>
> However that is not how it comes across.
>
> > The CLC site links to the InclusingNaming.org, and, in particular,
> > https://inclusivenaming.org/language/word-list/

Forgot to mention: that page is not particularly easy to use, as there
is no index to the words.

> >
> > We can certainly make this more evident. I'll attempt to make the
> > 'about' page less terse.
>
> It needs to be linked from the analysis pages, and ideally problematic
> words need to be linked to the suggested replacements.
>
> It should be made as easy as possible for projects to make changes
> where these are appropriate.
>
> Sebb.
> P.S. The diversity site is not totally clean.
>
> > --
> > Rich Bowen - rbo...@rcbowen.com
> > @rbowen

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: diversity-unsubscr...@apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: diversity-h...@apache.org

Reply via email to