On Mon, 30 Aug 2021 at 13:25, Rich Bowen <rbo...@rcbowen.com> wrote: > > > > On 8/30/21 6:07 AM, sebb wrote: > > The CLC checker flags lots of words, but does not give any help to > > projects in how to replace them. > > > > Whilst different contexts may require different solutions, it would > > help to at least point to some pages where previously worked out > > solutions are described. > > > > Otherwise projects are likely to waste a lot of time trying to find a > > suitable repalcement or just not bother. > > > > All stick and no carrot. > > There is no stick at all - no mandate or compulsion of any kind. The > carrot is the opportunity to make our communities more welcoming.
However that is not how it comes across. > The CLC site links to the InclusingNaming.org, and, in particular, > https://inclusivenaming.org/language/word-list/ > > We can certainly make this more evident. I'll attempt to make the > 'about' page less terse. It needs to be linked from the analysis pages, and ideally problematic words need to be linked to the suggested replacements. It should be made as easy as possible for projects to make changes where these are appropriate. Sebb. P.S. The diversity site is not totally clean. > -- > Rich Bowen - rbo...@rcbowen.com > @rbowen --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: diversity-unsubscr...@apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: diversity-h...@apache.org
