I thought about this but I think user@ would only makes sense if we were shipping a product and possible has some negative connotations otherwise
On Fri 17. May 2019 at 23:33, Andrew Musselman <andrew.mussel...@gmail.com> wrote: > +1 also (alternatively "discuss" could be "user" to mirror what people are > accustomed to for topic ettiquette) > > On Fri, May 17, 2019 at 1:01 PM Naomi Slater <n...@tumbolia.org> wrote: > > > I’m +1 on your counter proposal, Sam > > > > On Fri 17. May 2019 at 21:37, Sam Ruby <ru...@intertwingly.net> wrote: > > > > > On Fri, May 17, 2019 at 9:20 AM Naomi Slater <n...@tumbolia.org> > wrote: > > > > > > > > in summary, I have three proposed actions: > > > > > > > > - create diversity-private@ > > > > - create diversity-discuss@ or diversity-dev@ > > > > > > Counter proposal, consider: > > > > > > private@diversity > > > dev@diversity > > > > > > And ask that diversity@ be renamed to discuss@diversity, with > > > diversity@ being an alias for that list. The end result will be > > > something like infra, which is not a PMC: > > > > > > https://lists.apache.org/list.html?us...@infra.apache.org > > > > > > Note the list of mailing lists(*), including a drop down for other > lists. > > > > > > > - create https://diversity.apache.org/ > > > > > > +1 to this. > > > > > > - Sam Ruby > > > > > > (*) In case anyone is wondering, devnull is not a real list, it is > > > just there for infra testing purposes. > > > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: diversity-unsubscr...@apache.org > > > For additional commands, e-mail: diversity-h...@apache.org > > > > > > > > >
