On Tue, Jan 24, 2012 at 13:08, Omer Zak <[email protected]> wrote: > According to this definition, base64 encoded code is not source code. > I suppose that the theme in question was not made available in > non-obfuscated format (i.e. with decodings for all base64 encoded > stuff), hence the GPL violation. > Yes, we hate it, but we can't say that base64 is a kind of binary blobs because it isn't as you can decode it at any time and get the real source code and not a disassembled one. If we go to the court with this, can you please tell me what is the difference between a code in ASCII characters, Unicode and base64 encoded? Yes, MasterGate did something nasty, but I don't think this is enough in order to call it GPL violation.
-- *Tomer Cohen* http://tomercohen.com
_______________________________________________ Discussions mailing list [email protected] http://hamakor.org.il/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/discussions
