On 24/02/2022 02:13, faifl...@danwin1210.de wrote:
> Daniel: When does Fedora's corruption reach the point where you decided
> there is something better to spend your time on?
This is not past tense. The presence of defamation in the web sites of
certain free software projects is like a knife at the throat of the
volunteers.
> PLEASE NOTE: I'm not against you exposing their corruption. On the
> contrary, I am interested to read about it. In my opinion you are as
> justified in doing so as anyone else.
>
>
> Rather, I'm puzzled by the implication that:
>
>> This response is not just about me, it is about the rights of all
> volunteers to take pride in our contributions and assert our rights as
> authors of Fedora.
>
> What are the odds of that ever happening?
>
> It seems like people spend too much time hanging on to corrupt entities
> when forks would allow them to move forward.
The results of each domain dispute are published online by ICANN. They
may be considered as precedents in future disputes.
If this dispute leads to recognition of volunteers then it will be
easier for other volunteers to register domain names including the
trademarks of projects they contribute to.
This doesn't apply to trademarks like Coca-Cola or McDonalds. It does
apply to just about any trademark for a free software project, for
example, Fedora, Debian, FSF. It is not just about Fedora.
Regards,
Daniel
--
Debian Developer
https://danielpocock.com
_______________________________________________
Discussion mailing list
Discussion@lists.fsfellowship.eu
https://lists.fsfellowship.eu/mailman/listinfo/discussion
