Am Mittwoch 05 September 2018 21:44:20 schrieb Alessandro Rubini: > Having two options instead of one is always good.
Yes, this is why my post was about the effect chains if we use and support one tool or several ones. Because in a lot of situations others are already completely booked on one tool, I'm using all opportunites to use the other, because they come less often. Just like I am always trying to use https://iridiumbrowser.de/ instead of Chrome and Edge if I can. And a GNU system instead of Windows. LineageOS-microg over Vendor Android/Linux. And so on. It is not a major hassle for me, I'll just keep an eye open for more Free Software opportunities. But back to Mercurial SCM (aka hg from https://www.mercurial-scm.org/): > Today I read some (most?) documents on the project's site, and I see > that it's very similar, Thanks for giving hg a look. In my experience it is a sound option and comes with comparable power, if compared to git. > but on the flip side it looks like interactive > rebases are not as easy as they are with git, and I really use them a > lot (I write several features and test them all together, so I often > squash my fixes in the original commit before pushing). With due respect: Here you can see how your style of working was shaped by the tool. In my company (where we use hg and git) we'd already lost code because an interactive rebase can lead to data loss, thus breaking a mental concept that some have of an SCM to be able to reconstruct each configuration once it has been checked in. Still I believe interactive rebased can be useful, and you've probably found the extensions that allow it for hg, e.g. see the dicussion at https://stackoverflow.com/questions/1725607/can-i-squash-commits-in-mercurial#1725638 > Also, I don't like much the data model (which is why, I think, changing > the whole history is not as easy as with git). > > Thank you none the less, it was interesting reading. Thanks for considering hg, a technically diverse "ecosystem" is much more resilient against all sorts of "problems". :) Best Regards, Bernhard -- FSFE -- Founding Member Support our work for Free Software: blogs.fsfe.org/bernhard https://fsfe.org/donate | contribute
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
_______________________________________________ Discussion mailing list Discussion@lists.fsfe.org https://lists.fsfe.org/mailman/listinfo/discussion This mailing list is covered by the FSFE's Code of Conduct. All participants are kindly asked to be excellent to each other: https://fsfe.org/about/codeofconduct
