> Using Mercurial instead of git is also a bit like using another kernel > instead of Linux. It seems unnecessary to use something else when you already > have something that works, but it's useful to have working options in case > you find yourself using a device without a Linux port but with FreeBSD > support, for example.
True. Having two options instead of one is always good. Today I read some (most?) documents on the project's site, and I see that it's very similar, but on the flip side it looks like interactive rebases are not as easy as they are with git, and I really use them a lot (I write several features and test them all together, so I often squash my fixes in the original commit before pushing). Also, I don't like much the data model (which is why, I think, changing the whole history is not as easy as with git). Thank you none the less, it was interesting reading. /alessandro _______________________________________________ Discussion mailing list Discussion@lists.fsfe.org https://lists.fsfe.org/mailman/listinfo/discussion This mailing list is covered by the FSFE's Code of Conduct. All participants are kindly asked to be excellent to each other: https://fsfe.org/about/codeofconduct
