> On Mar 3, 2016, at 11:38 AM, Vivek Gupta <vive...@hcl.com> wrote:
> 
> Hi
> 
> Thanks for your reply. 
> Since OVS 2.5 was release just recently thus as per my assumption that there 
> may be unseen problems will arise with using DPDK 2.2.
> 
> Thus can we go ahead with OVS 2.4 with DPDK 2.1?

I suppose so, but there are a lot of improvements--particularly for 
OVS+DPDK--in OVS 2.5.  Also, 2.5 is an LTS (long-term service) release, which 
2.4 is not.

--Justin


_______________________________________________
discuss mailing list
discuss@openvswitch.org
http://openvswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss

Reply via email to