Cool, glad to hear that, On Mon, Oct 27, 2014 at 8:56 AM, Andrey Korolyov <and...@xdel.ru> wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 15, 2014 at 8:20 PM, Alex Wang <al...@nicira.com> wrote: > > Hey Andrey, > > > > On Wed, Oct 15, 2014 at 7:51 AM, Andrey Korolyov <and...@xdel.ru> wrote: > >> > >> Hi Alex, > >> > >> during transition from 2.1.3 to the 2.3.1 (both userspace and kernel > >> module) the 'first ping lost' appeared with completely static reactive > >> flows, so I am still investigating it, > > > > > > Could you provide more info on when you did ping? (i.e. after upgraded > > both userspace and kernel module, or after upgraded just one of them), > > > > > >> > >> because this behavior can > >> affect flow lifecycle with mixed proactive+reactive scheme. If anyone > >> is interested in some kind of debugging output for this exact issue, > >> please ask me. Hopefully I`ll be able to fix this soon and will report > >> on the original issue. > > > > > > Feel free to post any debug info, > > > Hello list, Alex, > > everything was ok on head of branch-2.1, moreover, branch-2.3 is > preferred now (except counter bug I just reported) because of lower > cpu usage with proactive flows. >
_______________________________________________ discuss mailing list discuss@openvswitch.org http://openvswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss
