Yes, you can try ping from the two vms. and the ping should work with this setup,
On Fri, Oct 18, 2013 at 4:42 PM, Nan <codingcat...@gmail.com> wrote: > Ah, thanks, Alex > > if I want the VMs on host 1 and host 2 to be able to communicate with each > other, > > I still need the tunnel? > > -- > Nan > > On Friday, 18 October, 2013 at 7:15 PM, Alex Wang wrote: > > Well, as the FAQ says, > > """ > A physical Ethernet device that is part of an Open vSwitch bridge > should not have an IP address. If one does, then that IP address > will not be fully functional. > """ > > The eth1 on br0 still has address "192.168.2.1". > > If you still want eth0 on br0 and eth1 having address "192.168.2.1", > one feasible configuration is to use tunnel. E.g. > * > * > *On host1:* > ovs-vsctl del-port eth1 > ovs-vsctl add-port tunnel_to_host2 -- set interface tunnel_to_host2 > type=gre options:remote_ip=192.168.2.2 > > *On host2:* > ovs-vsctl del-port eth1* > * > ovs-vsctl add-port tunnel_to_host1 -- set interface tunnel_to_host1 > type=gre options:remote_ip=192.168.2.1 > > This is actually a common solution for directing traffic to corresponding > physical interface. > > Thanks, > > >
_______________________________________________ discuss mailing list discuss@openvswitch.org http://openvswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss
