Ah, thanks, Alex if I want the VMs on host 1 and host 2 to be able to communicate with each other,
I still need the tunnel? -- Nan On Friday, 18 October, 2013 at 7:15 PM, Alex Wang wrote: > Well, as the FAQ says, > > """ > A physical Ethernet device that is part of an Open vSwitch bridge should not > have an IP address. If one does, then that IP address will not be fully > functional. > > """ > > The eth1 on br0 still has address "192.168.2.1". > > If you still want eth0 on br0 and eth1 having address "192.168.2.1", one > feasible configuration is to use tunnel. E.g. > > On host1: > ovs-vsctl del-port eth1 > ovs-vsctl add-port tunnel_to_host2 -- set interface tunnel_to_host2 type=gre > options:remote_ip=192.168.2.2 > > On host2: > ovs-vsctl del-port eth1 > ovs-vsctl add-port tunnel_to_host1 -- set interface tunnel_to_host1 type=gre > options:remote_ip=192.168.2.1 > > This is actually a common solution for directing traffic to corresponding > physical interface. > > Thanks,
_______________________________________________ discuss mailing list discuss@openvswitch.org http://openvswitch.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss
