On May 4, 2010, at 3:40 PM, Robert Brockway wrote: > > I only noticed this fairly recently although I suspect it has been brewing > for a while. What is now called a "technical architect" I might call a > SAGE Level IV sysadmin.
Agreed. Sysadmin only goes so high, in some companies. > Compare system administrator and network administrator. As far as I'm > concerned any senior sysadmin better be a networking guru but I've found > quite a wide variety of opinions on this topic, even among sysadmins. Network admin might be thus, but I've heard folks use that term for managing a bunch of windows machines. A network engineer tends to have a different skill set, and different knowledge, even from the SA's. They'll be found on NANOG, and live in world of routers & BGP. I know routing, but not at that level. Nor could I bring up multisite routing to various exchanges, with different QOS, working w/ multiple telco's, etc. I'm pretty comfortable w/ that being a separate domain, personally. Matthew _______________________________________________ Discuss mailing list Discuss@lopsa.org http://lopsa.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/discuss This list provided by the League of Professional System Administrators http://lopsa.org/
