On Mon, Apr 19, 2010 at 12:25 PM, Edward Ned Harvey <lop...@nedharvey.com>wrote:
> > From: discuss-boun...@lopsa.org [mailto:discuss-boun...@lopsa.org] On > > Behalf Of da...@lang.hm > > > > NAT is also useful to hide internal details of a network when you don't > > want them exposed. > > Actually, I agree, this is a very valid use case for NAT with IPv6. > There is a better way; to use RFC3041 addresses - systems get new addresses on whatever schedule you want (could be a really rapid rotation); and use them for outbound connections; separately from the main addresses they use for inbound connections. No NAT required. Colm -- Colm Buckley / c...@tuatha.org / +353 87 2469146
_______________________________________________ Discuss mailing list Discuss@lopsa.org http://lopsa.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/discuss This list provided by the League of Professional System Administrators http://lopsa.org/
