Hi Johannes,

With regard to my earlier message regarding the crash I'm seeing, I note
that a few tests fail when I run make test, is that to be expected?
Also do you think it would be possible to publish the reference waveform
that you are using ?
That way I could check to see if the crash occurs with your known 'good'
waveform too.

Mike


On 19 December 2013 18:37, Mike Cornelius <d...@drelectro.com> wrote:

> Hi Ralph,
>
> I had the same problem at first myself, there is no need to reconnect
> anything in the top_level.grc block so long as all the hier blocks have
> actually been compiled.
> In my case the biggest problem was the LTE_estimator_hier block would not
> compile because the 'import lte' failed (see earlier messages in this
> thread for details).
>
>
> Mike
>
>
> On 19 December 2013 18:27, Johannes Demel <uf...@student.kit.edu> wrote:
>
>> Hi everybody,
>>
>> I added screenshots for all the hierarchical flowgraphs and the top
>> flowgraph to the docs directory. I hope this helps to build the whole
>> LTE flowgraph in GRC.
>> Although, I realized that would be very helpful if the hierarchical
>> flowgraphs would be compiled with grcc during make and then installed.
>> Preferably added to a CMakeLists file. I will look into this.
>>
>> Happy hacking
>> Johannes
>>
>> On 18.12.2013 09:47, Johannes Demel wrote:
>> > Hi Ralph,
>> >
>> > unfortunately there are no screenshots yet. I guess it is a good idea to
>> > add some. After the estimator, there should be 2 blocks: Decode PBCH and
>> > Decode PCFICH. They take the same stream. and work in parallel. Then
>> > after Decode PBCH there is supposed to be a 'Decode BCH' block. These
>> > blocks may need some time to generate because they consist of hier
>> > blocks. That's kind of the tribute that has to be paid for a clean
>> > flowgraph.
>> > If you opened a flowgraph with missing blocks, as far as I know, to make
>> > the missing blocks appear you have to close and reopen at least this
>> > particular flowgraph.
>> >
>> > Happy hacking
>> > Johannes
>> >
>> >
>> > On Wed, Dec 18, 2013 at 3:49 AM, Ralph A. Schmid, dk5ras
>> > <ra...@schmid.xxx <mailto:ra...@schmid.xxx>> wrote:
>> >
>> >     Hi,
>> >
>> >     after opening and generating the hier blocks still the top_level.grc
>> >     has missing blocks, at least LTE estimator outputs and unpack MIB
>> >     inputs are unconnected, leaving a large white area in between. How
>> >     should this flowgraph look like, is there a screenshot available
>> >     somewhere?
>> >
>> >     Just wanted to put this all together in my lunch break, but seems
>> >     too big for such a short break anyway :)
>> >
>> >     Ralph.
>> >
>> >
>> >     > -----Original Message-----
>> >     > From: discuss-gnuradio-bounces+ralph=schmid....@gnu.org
>> >     <mailto:schmid....@gnu.org> [mailto:discuss-gnuradio-bounces+ralph
>> >     <mailto:discuss-gnuradio-bounces%2Bralph>=schmid....@gnu.org
>> >     <mailto:schmid....@gnu.org>] On Behalf Of
>> >     > Johannes Demel
>> >     > Sent: Sunday, 15 December, 2013 00:34
>> >     > To: discuss-gnuradio
>> >     > Subject: [Discuss-gnuradio] gr-lte updated to GNU Radio 3.7 API
>> >     >
>> >     > Hello GNU Radio enthusiasts,
>> >     >
>> >     > some time after the GNU Radio 3.7 release I started to move the
>> >     code for 'gr-lte' to the new API. Besides moving it to the new API,
>> I
>> >     > wanted to clean up code and rework a lot of tests. Thus, the whole
>> >     transition took a lot of time and work.
>> >     > Now, all current blocks are moved to the GNU Radio 3.7 API with
>> >     lots of enhancements. e.g. I tried to remove all hierarchical python
>> >     blocks
>> >     > and created them as GRC hier blocks instead. Or runtime status
>> >     events, like cell_id extraction, are all propagated through message
>> >     ports
>> >     > now.
>> >     > Also, there is a PyBOMBS recipe now to ease the installation
>> process.
>> >     >
>> >     > I hope 'gr-lte' can be useful for others.
>> >     >
>> >     > Source code is available at https://github.com/kit-cel/gr-lte
>> >     >
>> >     > Happy hacking
>> >     > Johannes
>> >     >
>> >     > _______________________________________________
>> >     > Discuss-gnuradio mailing list
>> >     > Discuss-gnuradio@gnu.org <mailto:Discuss-gnuradio@gnu.org>
>> >     > https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss-gnuradio
>> >
>> >
>> >     _______________________________________________
>> >     Discuss-gnuradio mailing list
>> >     Discuss-gnuradio@gnu.org <mailto:Discuss-gnuradio@gnu.org>
>> >     https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss-gnuradio
>> >
>> >
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Discuss-gnuradio mailing list
>> Discuss-gnuradio@gnu.org
>> https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss-gnuradio
>>
>
>
_______________________________________________
Discuss-gnuradio mailing list
Discuss-gnuradio@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss-gnuradio

Reply via email to