Hi Ralph,

I had the same problem at first myself, there is no need to reconnect
anything in the top_level.grc block so long as all the hier blocks have
actually been compiled.
In my case the biggest problem was the LTE_estimator_hier block would not
compile because the 'import lte' failed (see earlier messages in this
thread for details).


Mike


On 19 December 2013 18:27, Johannes Demel <uf...@student.kit.edu> wrote:

> Hi everybody,
>
> I added screenshots for all the hierarchical flowgraphs and the top
> flowgraph to the docs directory. I hope this helps to build the whole
> LTE flowgraph in GRC.
> Although, I realized that would be very helpful if the hierarchical
> flowgraphs would be compiled with grcc during make and then installed.
> Preferably added to a CMakeLists file. I will look into this.
>
> Happy hacking
> Johannes
>
> On 18.12.2013 09:47, Johannes Demel wrote:
> > Hi Ralph,
> >
> > unfortunately there are no screenshots yet. I guess it is a good idea to
> > add some. After the estimator, there should be 2 blocks: Decode PBCH and
> > Decode PCFICH. They take the same stream. and work in parallel. Then
> > after Decode PBCH there is supposed to be a 'Decode BCH' block. These
> > blocks may need some time to generate because they consist of hier
> > blocks. That's kind of the tribute that has to be paid for a clean
> > flowgraph.
> > If you opened a flowgraph with missing blocks, as far as I know, to make
> > the missing blocks appear you have to close and reopen at least this
> > particular flowgraph.
> >
> > Happy hacking
> > Johannes
> >
> >
> > On Wed, Dec 18, 2013 at 3:49 AM, Ralph A. Schmid, dk5ras
> > <ra...@schmid.xxx <mailto:ra...@schmid.xxx>> wrote:
> >
> >     Hi,
> >
> >     after opening and generating the hier blocks still the top_level.grc
> >     has missing blocks, at least LTE estimator outputs and unpack MIB
> >     inputs are unconnected, leaving a large white area in between. How
> >     should this flowgraph look like, is there a screenshot available
> >     somewhere?
> >
> >     Just wanted to put this all together in my lunch break, but seems
> >     too big for such a short break anyway :)
> >
> >     Ralph.
> >
> >
> >     > -----Original Message-----
> >     > From: discuss-gnuradio-bounces+ralph=schmid....@gnu.org
> >     <mailto:schmid....@gnu.org> [mailto:discuss-gnuradio-bounces+ralph
> >     <mailto:discuss-gnuradio-bounces%2Bralph>=schmid....@gnu.org
> >     <mailto:schmid....@gnu.org>] On Behalf Of
> >     > Johannes Demel
> >     > Sent: Sunday, 15 December, 2013 00:34
> >     > To: discuss-gnuradio
> >     > Subject: [Discuss-gnuradio] gr-lte updated to GNU Radio 3.7 API
> >     >
> >     > Hello GNU Radio enthusiasts,
> >     >
> >     > some time after the GNU Radio 3.7 release I started to move the
> >     code for 'gr-lte' to the new API. Besides moving it to the new API, I
> >     > wanted to clean up code and rework a lot of tests. Thus, the whole
> >     transition took a lot of time and work.
> >     > Now, all current blocks are moved to the GNU Radio 3.7 API with
> >     lots of enhancements. e.g. I tried to remove all hierarchical python
> >     blocks
> >     > and created them as GRC hier blocks instead. Or runtime status
> >     events, like cell_id extraction, are all propagated through message
> >     ports
> >     > now.
> >     > Also, there is a PyBOMBS recipe now to ease the installation
> process.
> >     >
> >     > I hope 'gr-lte' can be useful for others.
> >     >
> >     > Source code is available at https://github.com/kit-cel/gr-lte
> >     >
> >     > Happy hacking
> >     > Johannes
> >     >
> >     > _______________________________________________
> >     > Discuss-gnuradio mailing list
> >     > Discuss-gnuradio@gnu.org <mailto:Discuss-gnuradio@gnu.org>
> >     > https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss-gnuradio
> >
> >
> >     _______________________________________________
> >     Discuss-gnuradio mailing list
> >     Discuss-gnuradio@gnu.org <mailto:Discuss-gnuradio@gnu.org>
> >     https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss-gnuradio
> >
> >
>
> _______________________________________________
> Discuss-gnuradio mailing list
> Discuss-gnuradio@gnu.org
> https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss-gnuradio
>
_______________________________________________
Discuss-gnuradio mailing list
Discuss-gnuradio@gnu.org
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/discuss-gnuradio

Reply via email to