> 1. We have at least two people who are expert Go programmers - Ian and > myself. We have nobody, AFAIK, who is up to speed on Rust. Moving > the code will be a large amount of work - I don't think any good > purpose is siolved by adding "learn to be fluent in an entire new > language" on top of that.
I'm curious how future-proof golang is. If I remember correctly, it was a Google-project? Google is known to often deprecate technologies and projects ignoring communities wishes. Also rust (I understand the big problem of not much current knowledge in the project-team) is easier to use on microcontrollers. But maybe that's out of scope. Regards, _______________________________________________ devel mailing list devel@ntpsec.org http://lists.ntpsec.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
