Richard Laager via devel <devel@ntpsec.org>:
> On 8/23/19 6:55 PM, Hal Murray via devel wrote:
> > Or maybe wait for the NTS RFC to come out so we have a good reason for the
> > release.
>
> What is the official (or barring that, consensus) view on the quality of
> NTS in NTPsec? Is it something that is usable in production? If so,
> please cut a release sooner rather than later. If it's still
> experimental, a release is less critical.
My impression is that it is production ready, But I speak subject
to correction by Hal.
--
<a href="http://www.catb.org/~esr/";>Eric S. Raymond</a>
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list
devel@ntpsec.org
http://lists.ntpsec.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
